mitai-jinkendo/.claude/docs/audit/platzhalter/reconciliation-2026-03-30/EXECUTIVE_RECONCILIATION_SUMMARY.md

# Executive Reconciliation Summary

**Generated:** 2026-03-30 14:58:37
**Scope:** 111 Placeholders
**Data Sources:** Export Catalog, Audit Reports (2026-03-29), Draft Document

## Overview

This reconciliation consolidates data from three authoritative sources to create a single source of truth for all 111 placeholders.

### Key Findings

- **71** placeholders (63%) are implemented in code
- **8** placeholders (7%) are fully compliant with normative requirements
- **22** placeholders (20%) are partially compliant
- **81** placeholders (73%) are non-compliant

### Reconciliation Results

- **Verified Match (7):** Draft, Export, and Audit align perfectly
- **Needs Sharpening (49):** Correct but incomplete metadata
- **Needs Refactor (16):** Code-docs conflicts exist
- **Draft Wrong (0):** Draft specification incorrect
- **New Required (39):** Not implemented, needs build
- **Unclear (0):** Manual review needed

### Priority Distribution

- **P0 (Critical):** 83 placeholders
  - High usage (breaking change risk)
  - Missing documentation (category/description)
  - Unknown time window
- **P1 (High):** 10 placeholders
  - Partially compliant with minor gaps
- **P2 (Medium):** 10 placeholders
  - Non-compliant, needs work
- **P3 (Low):** 8 placeholders
  - Compliant, maintenance only

## Critical Issues

### 1. Known Code-Documentation Conflicts

- **`weight_trend`**: Code uses 28d, docs say 7d/30d
  - Resolution: Update docs to match code (28d)
- **`activity_summary`**: Code uses 14d, docs say 7d
  - Resolution: Update docs to match code (14d)
- **`activity_detail`**: Time window unclear in code
  - Resolution: Needs code review to determine actual time window

### 2. High-Usage Placeholders (Breaking Change Risk)

- **`name`** (19 uses, non_compliant)
- **`geschlecht`** (14 uses, non_compliant)
- **`height`** (12 uses, non_compliant)
- **`weight_aktuell`** (10 uses, compliant)
- **`weight_trend`** (10 uses, compliant)
- **`goal_bf_pct`** (10 uses, non_compliant)
- **`caliper_summary`** (8 uses, partially_compliant)
- **`circ_summary`** (8 uses, compliant)
- **`goal_weight`** (8 uses, non_compliant)
- **`protein_ziel_low`** (7 uses, non_compliant)
- **`protein_ziel_high`** (7 uses, non_compliant)
- **`activity_detail`** (4 uses, non_compliant)

### 3. Missing Documentation (P0)

**49** placeholders lack category classification
**49** placeholders lack descriptions

## Recommendations

### Immediate Actions (P0)

1. **Resolve Known Conflicts (3 placeholders, 2-4 hours)**
   - Update documentation to match code implementation
   - Validate time windows in code

2. **Classify Time Windows (74 placeholders, 8-12 hours)**
   - Use name-based extraction for `*_7d`, `*_28d` patterns
   - Extract from code default parameters
   - Manual classification for unclear cases

3. **Add Categories and Descriptions (49 placeholders, 4-6 hours)**
   - Bulk update from audit semantic analysis
   - Use existing audit report classifications

### Next Sprint (P1)

1. **Add Confidence Logic (103 placeholders, 12-16 hours)**
   - Implement for trend/delta placeholders
   - Add min-data thresholds

2. **Document Data Layer Modules (100 placeholders, 6-8 hours)**
   - Trace resolver functions to data layer
   - Document source tables

### Later (P2-P3)

1. **Integrate Unused Placeholders (67 placeholders)**
   - Create prompt use cases
   - Plan integration timeline

2. **Achieve Production Status (30+ placeholders)**
   - Reach 80%+ metadata completeness
   - Complete all normative requirements

## Conclusion

The reconciliation process successfully analyzed all 111 placeholders. 
While only 8 are currently fully compliant, 
the systematic gaps are primarily documentation-related rather than functional. 
With a structured remediation plan (estimated 82-110 hours), the system can reach 
>60% normative conformity within 4-6 weeks.

**Next Steps:**
1. Review this summary with product/tech leads
2. Prioritize P0 items for immediate action
3. Begin systematic remediation following the implementation waves