591 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
591 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
|
|
# Kairo – Method Design Principles
|
|||
|
|
## v0.1 – Designprinzipien für registrierbare Steuerungsmethoden
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**Status:** verbindlicher Architektur- und Methodendesign-Entwurf
|
|||
|
|
**Stand:** 2026-07-05
|
|||
|
|
**Zweck:** Definition der Designprinzipien, nach denen Kairo-Methoden künftig entwickelt, registriert, erweitert und versioniert werden.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 1. Ziel
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Kairo soll im Lauf der Zeit viele unterschiedliche Steuerungsmethoden unterstützen, ohne dass für jede Methode der komplette Codekern angepasst werden muss.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Methoden sollen sich ähnlich wie Widgets an einem klaren Abstraktionslayer anmelden können.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Die Architektur muss ermöglichen:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
- neue Methoden hinzufügen
|
|||
|
|
- bestehende Methoden versionieren
|
|||
|
|
- methodenspezifische Steuerungsstrukturen erzeugen
|
|||
|
|
- methodenspezifische NextAction-Logik einhängen
|
|||
|
|
- methodenspezifische Review-/Evidence-Logik einhängen
|
|||
|
|
- später Method Profiles konfigurieren
|
|||
|
|
- später Workflow-Fragmente an Hooks binden
|
|||
|
|
- später Agent/LLM/Tool-Steps pro Methode erlauben
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Gleichzeitig darf die Methodenarchitektur nicht beliebig und untestbar werden.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 2. Grundprinzip
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Eine Kairo-Methode ist kein Label.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Eine Kairo-Methode ist ein registriertes Steuerungspaket.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Sie beschreibt:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
- für welche Domains sie gilt
|
|||
|
|
- welche Scope Types sie steuern kann
|
|||
|
|
- welchen Standard Lifecycle sie nutzt oder erweitert
|
|||
|
|
- welche Steuerungsstrukturen sie benötigt
|
|||
|
|
- welche Hook Slugs sie unterstützt
|
|||
|
|
- welche Structure Builder sie bereitstellt
|
|||
|
|
- welche Signal Rules sie registriert
|
|||
|
|
- welche NextAction Strategy sie nutzt
|
|||
|
|
- welche Assignment / Waiting / Reminder / Escalation Strategy sie nutzt
|
|||
|
|
- welche Review- und Evidence-Policies gelten
|
|||
|
|
- welche Workflow-Fragmente später erlaubt sind
|
|||
|
|
- welche Node Types später erlaubt sind
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 3. Method Registry als zentraler Erweiterungspunkt
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Alle Methoden registrieren sich in einer zentralen Method Registry.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Zielbild:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
backend/steering/methods/registry.py
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Beispielhafte Registrierung:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```python
|
|||
|
|
register_method(
|
|||
|
|
MethodDefinition(
|
|||
|
|
method_key="maturity_progression",
|
|||
|
|
version="v1",
|
|||
|
|
label="Maturity Progression",
|
|||
|
|
supported_domains=["maturity_development", "personal_development"],
|
|||
|
|
supported_scope_types=["initiative", "roadmap_item", "action"],
|
|||
|
|
default_lifecycle="standard_development_lifecycle",
|
|||
|
|
required_structures=["roadmap", "roadmap_lanes", "roadmap_items", "backlog", "actions"],
|
|||
|
|
hook_slugs=[
|
|||
|
|
"on_goal_captured",
|
|||
|
|
"on_structure_required",
|
|||
|
|
"on_maturity_path_required",
|
|||
|
|
"on_next_action_requested",
|
|||
|
|
"on_evidence_required",
|
|||
|
|
"on_review_due",
|
|||
|
|
"on_reassessment_required",
|
|||
|
|
],
|
|||
|
|
structure_builders=[
|
|||
|
|
"maturity_path_builder",
|
|||
|
|
"practice_backlog_builder",
|
|||
|
|
],
|
|||
|
|
signal_rule_providers=[
|
|||
|
|
"maturity_gap_attention_rules",
|
|||
|
|
"evidence_required_rules",
|
|||
|
|
],
|
|||
|
|
next_action_strategy="maturity_next_action_strategy",
|
|||
|
|
assignment_strategy="default_actor_assignment_strategy",
|
|||
|
|
waiting_strategy="default_waiting_strategy",
|
|||
|
|
review_strategy="maturity_review_strategy",
|
|||
|
|
evidence_policy="maturity_evidence_policy",
|
|||
|
|
allowed_node_types=[
|
|||
|
|
"human_task",
|
|||
|
|
"evidence_check",
|
|||
|
|
"review",
|
|||
|
|
"reflection",
|
|||
|
|
"llm_prompt",
|
|||
|
|
"agent_task",
|
|||
|
|
],
|
|||
|
|
)
|
|||
|
|
)
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 4. Built-in zuerst, konfigurierbar später
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Die Methodenarchitektur folgt einem Stufenmodell.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Stufe 1 – Built-in Methods
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
- Methoden code-seitig definiert
|
|||
|
|
- klare Slugs
|
|||
|
|
- testbar
|
|||
|
|
- keine freie Nutzerkonfiguration
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Stufe 2 – Built-in Method Profiles
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
- vordefinierte Profile pro Methode
|
|||
|
|
- z. B. "einfach", "evidence_strict", "review_driven"
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Stufe 3 – Tenant Method Profiles
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
- tenant-spezifische Konfiguration
|
|||
|
|
- begrenzte Parameter
|
|||
|
|
- keine freie Ausführungslogik
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Stufe 4 – Workflow Bindings an Hooks
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
- kleine Workflow-Fragmente an definierte Hooks
|
|||
|
|
- nur erlaubte Node Types
|
|||
|
|
- nur innerhalb Method Governance
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### Stufe 5 – Method Designer
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
- spätere UI
|
|||
|
|
- nur für fortgeschrittene Nutzung
|
|||
|
|
- Governance, Tests und Freigaben erforderlich
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 5. Zentrale gemeinsame Strukturen
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Alle Methoden müssen auf gemeinsamen Kairo-Strukturen aufbauen.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Gemeinsame Kernstrukturen:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
SteeringContext
|
|||
|
|
Roadmap
|
|||
|
|
RoadmapLane
|
|||
|
|
RoadmapItem
|
|||
|
|
BacklogItem
|
|||
|
|
Action
|
|||
|
|
ActionAssignment
|
|||
|
|
Blocker
|
|||
|
|
Signal
|
|||
|
|
AttentionItem
|
|||
|
|
NextActionCandidate
|
|||
|
|
Evidence
|
|||
|
|
Review
|
|||
|
|
Decision
|
|||
|
|
Actor
|
|||
|
|
Capability
|
|||
|
|
AuditEvent
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Eine Methode darf keine parallelen Kernmodelle erfinden.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Beispiele:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
Meilenstein = RoadmapItem(type = milestone)
|
|||
|
|
Reifegrad = RoadmapItem(type = maturity_stage)
|
|||
|
|
Feature = RoadmapItem(type = feature)
|
|||
|
|
Kapitel = RoadmapItem(type = chapter)
|
|||
|
|
Sprint-Grobplanung = RoadmapItem(type = work_cycle)
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 6. Minimaler Standard Lifecycle
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Alle Methoden basieren auf einem gemeinsamen minimalen Lifecycle.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
intake
|
|||
|
|
method_selection
|
|||
|
|
structure_setup
|
|||
|
|
planning
|
|||
|
|
action_selection
|
|||
|
|
assignment
|
|||
|
|
waiting
|
|||
|
|
result_intake
|
|||
|
|
validation
|
|||
|
|
review
|
|||
|
|
adaptation
|
|||
|
|
closure
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Eine Methode darf:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
- Schritte auslassen
|
|||
|
|
- Schritte spezialisieren
|
|||
|
|
- zusätzliche Hook Slugs ergänzen
|
|||
|
|
- eigene Structure Builder an bestimmten Schritten registrieren
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Eine Methode darf nicht:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
- Tenant-Sicherheit umgehen
|
|||
|
|
- eigene Actor-Logik außerhalb des Actor-Modells einführen
|
|||
|
|
- eigene Rechteprüfung außerhalb der Capability-Schicht einführen
|
|||
|
|
- persistente Kernobjekte ohne Service-/Audit-Schicht verändern
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 7. Hook Slugs
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Hook Slugs sind stabile Einhängepunkte.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Sie sind die Hauptabstraktion, über die Methoden erweitert werden.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Beispiele:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
on_goal_captured
|
|||
|
|
on_method_selection_required
|
|||
|
|
on_method_selected
|
|||
|
|
on_structure_required
|
|||
|
|
on_roadmap_required
|
|||
|
|
on_backlog_required
|
|||
|
|
on_wbs_required
|
|||
|
|
on_maturity_path_required
|
|||
|
|
on_content_structure_required
|
|||
|
|
on_plan_required
|
|||
|
|
on_dependency_analysis_required
|
|||
|
|
on_dod_definition_required
|
|||
|
|
on_next_action_requested
|
|||
|
|
on_assignment_required
|
|||
|
|
on_wait_started
|
|||
|
|
on_due_date_reached
|
|||
|
|
on_result_overdue
|
|||
|
|
on_reminder_required
|
|||
|
|
on_escalation_required
|
|||
|
|
on_result_received
|
|||
|
|
on_dod_check_required
|
|||
|
|
on_evidence_required
|
|||
|
|
on_quality_gate_required
|
|||
|
|
on_review_due
|
|||
|
|
on_reassessment_required
|
|||
|
|
on_reflection_required
|
|||
|
|
on_replan_required
|
|||
|
|
on_structure_update_required
|
|||
|
|
on_closure_requested
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Hook Slugs müssen:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
- eindeutig sein
|
|||
|
|
- versionierbar bleiben
|
|||
|
|
- fachlich benannt sein
|
|||
|
|
- in Method Definitions referenziert werden
|
|||
|
|
- in Signals als Ursache auftauchen können
|
|||
|
|
- später Workflow Bindings tragen können
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 8. Structure Builder
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Structure Builder legen die methodenspezifische Steuerungsstruktur an.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Beispiele:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
roadmap_builder
|
|||
|
|
milestone_plan_builder
|
|||
|
|
feature_landscape_builder
|
|||
|
|
wbs_builder
|
|||
|
|
backlog_builder
|
|||
|
|
maturity_path_builder
|
|||
|
|
chapter_structure_builder
|
|||
|
|
cycle_structure_builder
|
|||
|
|
review_gate_builder
|
|||
|
|
routine_structure_builder
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Ein Structure Builder darf:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
- Roadmaps anlegen
|
|||
|
|
- RoadmapLanes anlegen
|
|||
|
|
- RoadmapItems anlegen
|
|||
|
|
- initiale BacklogItems vorschlagen oder erzeugen
|
|||
|
|
- methodenspezifische Startstruktur erzeugen
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Ein Structure Builder darf nicht:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
- ungeprüft produktive Actions erzeugen, wenn ein Gate vorgesehen ist
|
|||
|
|
- Actors ohne Assignment Strategy zuweisen
|
|||
|
|
- Tenant-Kontext aus Client Input übernehmen
|
|||
|
|
- Rechteprüfung umgehen
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 9. Strategies
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Methoden nutzen austauschbare Strategies.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Wichtige Strategy Interfaces:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
NextActionStrategy
|
|||
|
|
AttentionRuleProvider
|
|||
|
|
AssignmentStrategy
|
|||
|
|
WaitingStrategy
|
|||
|
|
ReminderStrategy
|
|||
|
|
EscalationStrategy
|
|||
|
|
ResultIntakeStrategy
|
|||
|
|
EvidencePolicy
|
|||
|
|
ReviewStrategy
|
|||
|
|
ClosurePolicy
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Diese Strategies sind zentrale Erweiterungspunkte.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Sie verhindern, dass methodenspezifische Logik monolithisch in Services oder Data Layer wächst.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 10. Signal Rules
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Signal Rules erzeugen AttentionItems und NextActionCandidates.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Sie müssen erklären können:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
- warum ein Signal erzeugt wurde
|
|||
|
|
- welcher Hook relevant ist
|
|||
|
|
- welche Methode/Domain beteiligt ist
|
|||
|
|
- welcher Scope betroffen ist
|
|||
|
|
- welche Datenquelle genutzt wurde
|
|||
|
|
- welche nächste Handlung empfohlen wird
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Signal Rules müssen tenant-sicher sein und dürfen nicht quer über Tenants lesen.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 11. Method Definition Contract
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Eine MethodDefinition sollte mindestens enthalten:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
method_key
|
|||
|
|
version
|
|||
|
|
label
|
|||
|
|
description
|
|||
|
|
supported_domains
|
|||
|
|
supported_scope_types
|
|||
|
|
default_lifecycle
|
|||
|
|
required_structures
|
|||
|
|
allowed_structures
|
|||
|
|
hook_slugs
|
|||
|
|
structure_builders
|
|||
|
|
attention_rule_providers
|
|||
|
|
next_action_strategy
|
|||
|
|
assignment_strategy
|
|||
|
|
waiting_strategy
|
|||
|
|
reminder_strategy
|
|||
|
|
escalation_strategy
|
|||
|
|
result_intake_strategy
|
|||
|
|
review_strategy
|
|||
|
|
evidence_policy
|
|||
|
|
closure_policy
|
|||
|
|
allowed_workflow_fragments
|
|||
|
|
allowed_node_types
|
|||
|
|
default_configuration
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 12. Method Versioning
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Methoden müssen versionierbar sein.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Regeln:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
- method_key bleibt stabil
|
|||
|
|
- version beschreibt fachliche/technische Methode
|
|||
|
|
- bestehende SteeringContexts referenzieren method_key + version
|
|||
|
|
- neue Versionen dürfen bestehende Kontexte nicht stillschweigend verändern
|
|||
|
|
- Migration oder Upgrade muss explizit sein
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 13. Method Profiles
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Method Profiles sind spätere konkrete Konfigurationen.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Sie dürfen Parameter anpassen, aber nicht den Kairo-Kern umgehen.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Beispiele:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
maturity_progression.basic
|
|||
|
|
maturity_progression.evidence_strict
|
|||
|
|
content_chapter_based.light_review
|
|||
|
|
product_milestone_driven.release_focused
|
|||
|
|
routine_control.escalation_strict
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Ein Method Profile darf z. B. konfigurieren:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
- welche Hooks aktiv sind
|
|||
|
|
- welche Review-Frequenz gilt
|
|||
|
|
- ob Evidence erforderlich ist
|
|||
|
|
- welche Reminder-Strategie gilt
|
|||
|
|
- welche Node Types erlaubt sind
|
|||
|
|
- ob Agent Steps erlaubt sind
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Ein Method Profile darf nicht:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
- beliebigen Code ausführen
|
|||
|
|
- Tenant-Sicherheit umgehen
|
|||
|
|
- Capabilities außer Kraft setzen
|
|||
|
|
- systemgeschützte Hooks überschreiben
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 14. Methodenbeispiele
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 14.1 product_milestone_driven
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
Domain:
|
|||
|
|
- product_development
|
|||
|
|
- project
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Structures:
|
|||
|
|
- Roadmap
|
|||
|
|
- Feature Lane
|
|||
|
|
- Architecture Lane
|
|||
|
|
- Release Lane
|
|||
|
|
- Backlog
|
|||
|
|
- Actions
|
|||
|
|
- Blockers
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Primary Hooks:
|
|||
|
|
- on_goal_captured
|
|||
|
|
- on_roadmap_required
|
|||
|
|
- on_backlog_required
|
|||
|
|
- on_next_action_requested
|
|||
|
|
- on_review_due
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 14.2 content_chapter_based
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
Domain:
|
|||
|
|
- content_development
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Structures:
|
|||
|
|
- Roadmap
|
|||
|
|
- Chapter Lane
|
|||
|
|
- Research Lane
|
|||
|
|
- Draft Lane
|
|||
|
|
- Review Lane
|
|||
|
|
- Backlog
|
|||
|
|
- Actions
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Primary Hooks:
|
|||
|
|
- on_content_structure_required
|
|||
|
|
- on_next_action_requested
|
|||
|
|
- on_review_due
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 14.3 maturity_progression
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
Domain:
|
|||
|
|
- maturity_development
|
|||
|
|
- personal_development
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Structures:
|
|||
|
|
- Roadmap
|
|||
|
|
- Maturity Stage Lane
|
|||
|
|
- Capability Lane
|
|||
|
|
- Practice Lane
|
|||
|
|
- Evidence Lane
|
|||
|
|
- Reflection Lane
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Primary Hooks:
|
|||
|
|
- on_maturity_path_required
|
|||
|
|
- on_evidence_required
|
|||
|
|
- on_review_due
|
|||
|
|
- on_reassessment_required
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 14.4 wbs_driven
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
Domain:
|
|||
|
|
- project
|
|||
|
|
- program
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Structures:
|
|||
|
|
- WBS Roadmap
|
|||
|
|
- Work Package Items
|
|||
|
|
- Dependencies
|
|||
|
|
- Backlog
|
|||
|
|
- Actions
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Primary Hooks:
|
|||
|
|
- on_wbs_required
|
|||
|
|
- on_dependency_analysis_required
|
|||
|
|
- on_next_action_requested
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 15. Designprinzipien kurz
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
1. Methoden sind registrierte Steuerungspakete, keine Labels.
|
|||
|
|
2. Neue Methoden melden sich an einer Registry an.
|
|||
|
|
3. Alle Methoden nutzen gemeinsame Kairo-Kernstrukturen.
|
|||
|
|
4. Der Standard Lifecycle ist die gemeinsame Basis.
|
|||
|
|
5. Erweiterung erfolgt über Hook Slugs, Structure Builder und Strategies.
|
|||
|
|
6. Built-in Methods kommen vor freier Konfiguration.
|
|||
|
|
7. Profiles konfigurieren, aber ersetzen nicht den Kern.
|
|||
|
|
8. Signals müssen erklärbar und tenant-sicher sein.
|
|||
|
|
9. Agenten und LLMs sind spätere Step Provider, nicht Methoden selbst.
|
|||
|
|
10. Keine Methode darf Capabilities, TenantContext oder Actor-Modell umgehen.
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 16. Konsequenz für die technische Zielarchitektur
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Die technische Zielarchitektur muss diese Methodendesign-Prinzipien als verbindlich übernehmen.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Insbesondere muss sie definieren:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```text
|
|||
|
|
- Method Registry
|
|||
|
|
- Hook Registry
|
|||
|
|
- MethodDefinition Contract
|
|||
|
|
- Standard Lifecycle
|
|||
|
|
- Structure Builder Interfaces
|
|||
|
|
- Strategy Interfaces
|
|||
|
|
- Signal Rule Provider Interfaces
|
|||
|
|
- Method Versioning
|
|||
|
|
- Method Profiles als spätere Konfigurationsebene
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|